Valuing Diverse Experience

Potential candidates who have done lots of previous party campaigning (especially “traditional” activities such as door-knocking and leafleting) may be seen as more loyal, reliable, or deserving of being an elected representative than those who have gained their experience in other contexts. While it is reasonable to expect a qualified candidate to have participated in party activities, it is not the only measure of a strong candidate. An assessment process which places too much importance on the number of hours spent on party campaigning alone can have a negative impact on candidate diversity. This is known as presenteeism, and you can read more about this in the Events, Activities and Elections chapter.

Often those from underrepresented groups - including disabled people, ethnic minority people, women and LGBTI people - are more likely to experience barriers to participation in party activities like campaigning or attending meetings due to an impairment, caring responsibilities or personal safety concerns. It is important to remember that participating in party campaigning is time-consuming and often incurs costs to activists. A low income and having to prioritise paid work can further compound existing barriers, reducing opportunities to gain experience in party activities. For more information on how to make your activities more inclusive, please see the Events, Activities and Elections chapter.

During candidate assessment, it is important to recognise that someone may have gained the skills and experience that would make them a strong candidate outside of party politics. Many potential candidates will have work, community, or other experiences just credible as party political campaigning. Having candidates with a wide range of experiences, backgrounds and perspectives – not just experience in the party – is positive and should be viewed as an asset.

Go back to the Candidate Assessment homepage